The Clash Between Science And Common Sense Through A Weather Lens
SOURCE: FORBES.COM
AUG 24, 2025
Senior Contributor.
Aug 24, 2025
PUNXSUTAWNEY, PA - FEBRUARY 2: Official groundhog handler Bill Deeley holds Punxsutawney Phil on February 2, 2006 in Punxsutawney, Pennsylvania. Every February 2, people gather at Gobbler's Knob, a wooded knoll just outside of Punxsutawney to watch Punxsutawney Phil look for his shadow. If he sees his shadow, it means six more weeks of winter. If he does not see his shadow, it means spring is just around the corner. The legend of Groundhog Day is based on an old Scottish couplet: "If Candlemas Day is bright and clear, there'll be two winters in the year." (Photo by Jeff Swensen/Getty Images)... More
Getty Images
Scientific inquiry and advancements benefit society in so many ways. Vaccines, weather prediction models, artificial intelligence, or precision agriculture techniques are examples of how research and development translate to “So What?” Though always lurking, we seem to have an explosion of “keyboard or social media” rhetoric that pits scientific expertise against common sense. Using the lens of my scientific field of atmospheric sciences, I want to explore this conflict and offer some pathways forward.
I grew up in a small Georgia community where people took pride in common sense. During my youth, I recall hearing adults talking about using common sense or someone’s lack of it. What is common sense? It’s honestly one of those things that you kind of know it when you see it. Dictionary.com defined it as, “Sound practical judgment that is independent of specialized knowledge, training, or the like; normal native intelligence.” For example, common sense would dictate that someone should not stand in a golf course fairway holding a 4—iron in the middle of an electrical storm. You don’t need a doctorate in meteorology or public health to arrive at that conclusion.

MUNICH, Germany: Four golfers swarm into a little caddy car as they are surprised by a hailstorm during a golf tournament in Munich on 28 June 2005. The storm took ten minutes only, and the sportsmen continued their competition afterwards. AFP PHOTO DDP/JOERG KOCH GERMANY OUT (Photo credit should read JOERG KOCH/DDP/AFP via Getty Images)... More
DDP/AFP via Getty Images
PROMOTED
Over the course of my thirty—ish years within the field of meteorology, I have tracked a subtle tension between weather expertise, climate knowledge, and common sense. Unlike nuclear physics or cardiology, people experience “meteorology” and “climate” daily. Whenever I mention my profession to someone in line at lunch, it often leads to thoughts about the weather or climate change. I doubt that a nuclear engineer gets a person’s suggestions on fuel rod technology as they order a sandwich.
The public has experiences with cold fronts, ominous cloud patterns, and seasonal temperatures. Cultural marinades have also likely exposed them to weather-predicting almanacs, traditions like Groundhog Day, or sayings about weather conditions passed on from generation to generation.
MORE FOR YOU
Meteorology and climate science are very quantitative sciences that involve significant exposure to advance mathematics, physics, computational sciences, chemistry, and more. The atmosphere is a fluid within a rotating system with several external factors such as oceans, mountains, greenhouse gasses, landcover changes and more. As we approach the peak of the Atlantic hurricane season and reflect on the 20th anniversary of Hurricane Katrina, I will use hurricanes as an example of the clash between common sense and science.
The Prompt: Get the week’s biggest AI news on the buzziest companies and boldest breakthroughs, in your inbox.
Hurricane Erin rapidly intensified last weekend as it moved across the Atlantic Ocean. For many days, it was tracking on a path towards North Carolina. However, the weather prediction models and forecasters were in consensus that the storm would make a northeastward turn and head out to see. As I monitored popular social media sites, there were a litany of common—sense expert takes out there. Some people said, “There’s no way it is not going to turn, it is going make landfall in the U.S.” Others came up with false or illogical theories on the fly like, “They move how they want to when they get that strong, so it is going to go straight” or “It’s going to get to Category 6 soon.” By the way, there is no such thing as a Category 6 storm on the Saffir—Simpson Scale.

Ultimately, Erin made the turn that we expected. The scientific models clearly indicated that it would, but the “common sense” lens on the storm fed other perceptions. I am the former president of the American Meteorological Society and serve as director of the atmospheric sciences program at the University of Georgia. I host the Weather Geeks podcast for the Weather Channel and spent twelve years as a research meteorologist at NASA Goddard Space Flight. I mention those things to establish that I have been a part of the weather community for a long time. Here are some of the more popular common—sense takes that I have corrected over the years:

Greenhouse Effect illustrated.
NPS
I could go on with many other examples, but I hope you get the point about how common sense can clash with the science and lead to bad interpretations.

Condensation trails of airplanes are seen in the sky above the ski resort of Zauchensee, Austria on January 15, 2022. (Photo by Joe Klamar / AFP) (Photo by JOE KLAMAR/AFP via Getty Images)
AFP via Getty Images
At some point you have probably heard of K.I.S.S. and not the legendary rock band with the makeup. K.I.S.S. is an acronym for “Keep It Simple Stupid.” I think it shapes a lot of the conflict between science and common sense. Many people view science as methodical, complicated, and out of touch with specific problems. People often resonate with simple explanations that align with their own mental models, level of understanding, or belief system. This is also why conspiracy theories can spread widely.
People benefit from cellphones and computers every day but probably do not connect the dots that scientific research in physics, thermodynamics, and engineering enabled them. Science, technology, engineering, and mathematics professionals must continue to make the science accessible by knowing audiences, minimizing jargon, using analogies or real-world examples, and applying miniature, meaningful, and memorable (3M’s) messaging.

Using satnav app on a mobile phone while driving on M25 motorway, UK. (Photo by: Alex Segre/UCG/Universal Images Group via Getty Images)
UCG/Universal Images Group via Getty Images
Additionally, the public is bombarded with or has access to a lot of information in these days. In my experience, I have noticed that many people don’t understand that a video on the Internet, a post on social media, or an “official-looking” report may not be credible, vetted, or properly scrutinized by peers. Several years ago, I published a guide to consuming science information online. I strongly encourage everyone to revisit those principles periodically.
Trust is also important. Common sense is rooted in personal experiences and assessments, so people trust what they feel, think or see. This one can be a tough nut to crack because geographic, cultural, political, religious, and other types of marinades can shape experiences. I recently spoke to a group of peanut farmers about weather and climate risk. Farmers are critical to all of us, and I have so much respect for what they do. It is hard. Their livelihood and the products that come from their seeds are strongly dependent on weather and climate.
Because I knew there were multiple viewpoints likely in the room, I framed my discussion in a way that gained trust. I said something like, “My experiences and the data give me a good sense of what’s going on. However, whatever you think is or is not causing them, our farmers are going to face storms like Hurricane Helene or Hurricane Michael again. I’d rather discuss how to make them more resilient rather than debate what you believe is causing it”
A 2025 study in the journal Nature Human Behavior examined trust in scientists around the world. Encouragingly, it is moderately high, particularly in the U.S. However, a 2024 Pew Research Center study signaled caution. While it found that the American public’s confidence increased to 76%, it was still down compared to pre-pandemic years. The study also revealed that 52% of the respondents felt that scientists were poor communicators, and 47% felt that scientists come across as superior to others. Though some of the results varied by political identify, race, and ethnicity, there are certainly lessons in these numbers too.
I have advanced degrees and am a member of three national—level academies. However, I am equally proud of my grounding in common sense. I am just as comfortable testifying before the House Science Committee in Washington, D.C. as I am cracking open boiled peanuts with a local farmer along the side of a country Georgia road.

Rear view of adult male operating peanut digger pulling up row of peanut plants to dry in sun, Tifton, Georgia. (Photo by: Edwin Remsberg / VWPics/Universal Images Group via Getty Images)
VW Pics/Universal Images Group via Getty Images
LATEST NEWS
Devices
Quantum tech breakthrough: China’s double-photon device breaks efficiency ceiling
MAR 08, 2026
WHAT'S TRENDING
Data Science
5 Imaginative Data Science Projects That Can Make Your Portfolio Stand Out
OCT 05, 2022
SOURCE: THECONVERSATION.COM
MAR 08, 2026
SOURCE: BOCARATONTRIBUNE.COM
MAR 01, 2026
SOURCE: MOTHERJONES.COM
MAR 01, 2026
SOURCE: MACOMBDAILY.COM
FEB 21, 2026
SOURCE: THECONVERSATION.COM
FEB 15, 2026
SOURCE: LIVESCIENCE.COM
FEB 15, 2026